Dos versiones breves del Big Five Inventory en universitarios peruanos: BFI-15p y BFI-10p
Palabras clave:
Cinco Grandes Factores (BFI), rotación procusteana, estudiantes universitarios, validez, confiabilidad
Resumen
El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo obtener dos versiones breves (de 15 y 10 ítems) del Big Five Inventory (BFI) con bases empíricas y conceptuales. Participaron 332 universitarios peruanos (82.83% mujeres) entre 16 y 48 años (M = 20.39). El análisis principal fue realizado mediante el método de mínimos cuadrados no ponderados y rotación procusteana oblicua con una matriz completamente especificada. En cuanto a los resultados, las dos versiones breves mostraron propiedades psicométricas robustas: estructura factorial adecuada y evidencias de equivalencia empírica con la versión extensa. Finalmente, las dos versiones (15 y 10 ítems) mostraron índices de confiabilidad aceptables (αpromedio > .60). En conclusión, las versiones estudiadas evidencian indicadores psicométricos favorables que posibilitarían su uso en evaluaciones de grupo e investigación básica.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Citas
Bashaw, W. L., & Anderson, H. E. (1967). A correction for replicated error in correlation coefficients. Psychometrika, 32, 435-441. Doi: 10.1007/BF02289657
Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729 – 750. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729
Brown, W. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 296-322. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1910.tb00207.x
Browne, M. W. (1972). Oblique rotation to a partially specified target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 207-212.
Carciofo, R., Yang, J., Song, N., Du, F., & Zhang, K. (2016). Psychometric evaluation of chinese-language 44-item and 10-item big five personality inventories, including correlations with chronotype, mindfulness and mind wandering. PLoS One, 11(2), 1 – 26. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149963
Carvalho, L., Nunes, M., Primi, R., & Nunes, C. (2012). Unfavorable evidence for personality assessment with a 10-item instrument. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22(51), 63-71. Doi: 10.1590/S0103-863X2012000100008
Charter, R. (2001). It is time to bury the Spearman-Brown “prophecy” formula for some common applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(4), 690-696. Doi: 10.1177/00131640121971446
Cheung, G.W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233 – 255. Doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J., & Leong, F. T. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66(7), 593 – 603. doi: 10.1037/a0022389
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Denissen, J.J.A., Greenen, R., van Aken, M.A.G., Gosling, S.D., & Potter, J. (2008). Development and validation of a dutch translation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(2), 151 – 157. Doi: 10.1080/00223890701845229
Dominguez-Lara, S. (en prensa). Fiabilidad y alfa ordinal. Actas Urológicas Españolas. Doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.07.002
Dominguez-Lara, S. (2014). ¿Matrices Policóricas/Tetracóricas o Matrices Pearson? Un estudio metodológico. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 6(1), 39-48.
Dominguez-Lara, S. (2016). Evaluación de la confiabilidad del constructo mediante el Coeficiente H: breve revisión conceptual y aplicaciones. Psychologia: Avances en la disciplina, 10(2), 87 – 94.
Dominguez-Lara, S. & Merino-Soto, C. (en prensa). Versión breve de la Escala de afrontamiento ante la ansiedad e incertidumbre preexamen (COPEAU) en universitarios peruanos. Educación Médica. doi: 10.1016/j.edumed.2017.04.01
Dominguez-Lara, S. & Merino-Soto, C. (2015). ¿Por qué es importante reportar los intervalos de confianza del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach? Revista Lationamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 13(2), 1326-1328.
Dominguez-Lara, S., Merino-Soto, C., & Navarro-Loli, J. (2016). Estimación de la Confiabilidad en Mediciones de dos ítems: el Coeficiente Angoff-Feldt. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 10(1), 34 – 40. doi: /10.19083/ridu.10.463
Dominguez-Lara, S., Merino-Soto, C., Zamudio, B., & Guevara, C. (en prensa). Big Five Inventory en universitarios peruanos: Resultados preliminares de la validación. Psykhé.
Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399 – 412. Doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046
Elosua, P., & Zumbo, B.D. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada. Psicothema, 20(4), 896-901.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Feldt, L. S. (1980). A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient is the same for two tests administered to the same sample. Psychometrika, 45, 99-105. doi: 10.1007/BF02293600
Feldt, L. S., & Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. En Linn, R. L. (Ed). En Educational Measurement (pp. 105 – 146). New York: Macmillan.
Feldt, L. S., & Charter, R. A. (2003). Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length. Psychological Methods, 8(1), 102-109. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.1.102
Feldt, L. S., Woodruff, D. J., & Salih, F. A. (1987) Statistical inference for coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11(1), 93-103. Doi: 10.1177/014662168701100107
Ferrando, P.J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33.
Fetvadjiev, V., & Van der Vijver, F.J.R. (2015). Universality of the five-factor model of personality. In J.D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol 9, p. 249 – 253). Oxford: Elsevier.
Fisher, R. (1950). Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver & Boyd.
Fleming, J., & Merino, C. (2005). Medidas de simplicidad y ajuste factorial: Un enfoque para la construcción y revisión de escalas derivadas factorialmente. Revista de Psicología, 23(2), 252-266.
Fossati, A., Borroni, S., Marchione, D., & Maffei, C. (2011). The Big Five Inventory (BFI). Reliability and Validity of its Italian Translation in Three Independent Nonclinical Samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 50-58. Doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000043
Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B.D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 17(3). Recuperado de: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=17&n=3.
Gerlitz J. Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. Dokumentation der Instrumentenentwicklung BFI-S auf Basis des SOEP-Pretests 2005. DIW Research, Notes 4.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216 – 1229. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
Goldberg, L. R., & Kilkowski, J. M. (1985). The prediction of semantic consistency in self-descriptions: Characteristics of persons and of terms that affect the consistency of responses to synonym and antonym pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 82 – 98.
Goldberg, L., Johnson, J., Eber, H., Hogan, R., Ashton, R., & Robert, C. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
Gosling, S., Rentfrow, P., & Swann, W., (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. Doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
Guido, G., Peluso, A.M., Capestro, M., & Miglietta, M. (2015). An italian version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory: An application to hedonic and utilitarian shopping values. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 135 – 140. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.053
Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(2), 354 – 370. Doi: 10.1037/a0030841
Hahn, E., Gottschling, J., & Spinath, F. M. (2012). Short measurements of personality–Validity and reliability of the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S). Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 355-359. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.008
Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. En R. Cudeck, S. H. C. du Toit & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Past and present. A Festschrift in honor of Karl G. Jöreskog (pp. 195–261). Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and brain sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. Doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
John, O.P., Donahue, E.M., & Kentle, R.L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. California: Institute of Personality and Social Research.
Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-35. Doi: 10.1007/BF02291575
Kim, S.Y., Kim, J.M., Yoo, J.A., Bae K.Y., Kim, S.W., Yang, S.J., Shin, I.S., & Yoon, J.S. (2010). Standardization and validation of Big Five Inventory – Korean version (BFI-K) in elders. Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 17(1), 15-25.
Lance, C., Dawson, B., Birkelbach, D., & Hoffman, B. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 435-455. Doi: 10.1177/1094428109352528
Lautenschlager, G. J., & Meade, A. W. (2008). AlphaTest: A windows program for tests of hypotheses about coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 502-503. Doi: 10.1177/0146621607312307
Levy, P. (1967). The correction for spurious correlation in the evaluation of short-form tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 84-86.
Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. Doi: 10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. (2013). FACTOR 9.2 A comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497-498. Doi: 10.1177/0146621613487794
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J.M.F. (2006). Tucker's Congruence Coefficient as a Meaningful Index of Factor Similarity. Methodology, 2, 57-64. Doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57.
Lovik, A., Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2017). Evaluation of a very short test to measure the Big Five personality factors on a Flemish sample. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 25(2), 7-17.
McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547 – 561. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Merino, C., & Grimaldo, M. (2011). Complejidad factorial y conductas moralmente controversiales. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 3(3), 38-43.
Merino-Soto, C., Navarro-Loli, J., & García, W. (2014). Revisión de la consistencia interna del Inventario de Inteligencia Emocional de Bar-On, EQ-I: YV. Revista Peruana de Psicología y Trabajo Social, 3(1),141-154.
Ortet, G., Ibáñez, M., Ruipérez, M., Villa, H., Moya, J., & Escrivá, P. (2007). Adaptación para adolescentes de la versión española del NEO PI-R. Psicothema, 19(2), 263-268.
Pejić, M., Tenjović, L., & Knežević, G. (2014). Validacija upitnika ličnosti BFI-10–kratke forme inventara velikih pet. Primenjena Psihologija, 7(1), 45-92.
Pérez, E., & Medrano, L. A. (2010). Análisis factorial exploratorio: bases conceptuales y metodológicas. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2(1), 58-66.
Petrides, K. V., Jackson, C. J., Furnham, A., & Levine, S. Z. (2003). Exploring issues of personality measurement and structure throughthe development of a short form of the Eysenck personality profiler. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 271–280. Doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8103_10
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. Doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Ponterotto, J.G., & Charter R.A. (2009). Statistical extensions of Ponterotto and Ruckdeschel´s (2007) reliability matriz for estimating the adecuacy of internal consistency coefficients. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108, 878 – 886. Doi: 10.2466/PMS.108.3.878-886
Putnam, S. P., & Rothbart, M. K. (2006). Development of short and very short forms of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 102-112. Doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_09
Rammstedt, B. (2007): The 10-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10): Norm values and inves¬tigation of socio-demographic effects based on a German population representative sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 193-201. Doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.193
Rammstedt, B., & John, O.P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203 – 212. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
Rammstedt, B., Kemper, C. J., Klein, M. C., Beierlein, C., & Kovaleva, A. (2013). Eine kurze skala zur messung der fünf dimensionen der persönlichkeit. Methoden, Daten, Analysen, 7(2), 233-249.
Reyes, E., Álvarez, C., Peredo, A., Miranda, A., & Rebolledo, I. (2014). Psychometric properties of the big five inventory in a Mexican sample. Salud Mental, 37, 491 – 497.
Rodriguez, M., & Ruiz, M. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: Incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica, 29, 205-227.
Romano, J. L., Kromrey, J. D., & Hibbard, S. T. (2010). A Monte Carlo study of eight confidence interval methods for coefficient alpha. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 376-393. Doi: 10.1177/0013164409355690
Romano, J. L., Kromrey, J. D., Owens, C. M., & Scott, H. M. (2011). Confidence interval methods for coefficient alpha on the basis of discrete, ordinal response items: Which one, if any, is the best? The Journal of Experimental Education 79(4), 382-403. Doi: 10.1080/00220973.2010.510859
Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg´s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506-516. Doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 173-212. Doi: 10.1177/0022022106297299
Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated with faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271-295. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1910.tb00206.x
Tataryn, D., Wood, J., & Gorsuch, R. (1999). Setting the value of k in promax: A Monte Carlo study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 384-391. Doi: 10.1177/00131649921969938
Ten Berge, J. (1986). Some relationships between descriptive comparisons of components from different studies. Mutivariate Behavioral Research, 21(1), 29-40. Doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2101_2
Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. Personnel Research Section Report, 984. Washington, D. C.: Department of the Army.
Ubbiali, A., Chiorri, C., Hampton, P., & Donati, D. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Italian adaptation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 266, 37–46.
Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Kijima, N., Yoshimura, K., ... & Livesley, W. J. (2006). Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(6), 987-999. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.987
Worrell, F. C., & Cross,William E.,,Jr. (2004). The reliability and validity of big five inventory scores with African American college students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 32(1), 18 – 32. Doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1912.2004.tb00358.x
Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729 – 750. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729
Brown, W. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 296-322. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1910.tb00207.x
Browne, M. W. (1972). Oblique rotation to a partially specified target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 207-212.
Carciofo, R., Yang, J., Song, N., Du, F., & Zhang, K. (2016). Psychometric evaluation of chinese-language 44-item and 10-item big five personality inventories, including correlations with chronotype, mindfulness and mind wandering. PLoS One, 11(2), 1 – 26. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149963
Carvalho, L., Nunes, M., Primi, R., & Nunes, C. (2012). Unfavorable evidence for personality assessment with a 10-item instrument. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22(51), 63-71. Doi: 10.1590/S0103-863X2012000100008
Charter, R. (2001). It is time to bury the Spearman-Brown “prophecy” formula for some common applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(4), 690-696. Doi: 10.1177/00131640121971446
Cheung, G.W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233 – 255. Doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J., & Leong, F. T. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66(7), 593 – 603. doi: 10.1037/a0022389
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Denissen, J.J.A., Greenen, R., van Aken, M.A.G., Gosling, S.D., & Potter, J. (2008). Development and validation of a dutch translation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(2), 151 – 157. Doi: 10.1080/00223890701845229
Dominguez-Lara, S. (en prensa). Fiabilidad y alfa ordinal. Actas Urológicas Españolas. Doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.07.002
Dominguez-Lara, S. (2014). ¿Matrices Policóricas/Tetracóricas o Matrices Pearson? Un estudio metodológico. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 6(1), 39-48.
Dominguez-Lara, S. (2016). Evaluación de la confiabilidad del constructo mediante el Coeficiente H: breve revisión conceptual y aplicaciones. Psychologia: Avances en la disciplina, 10(2), 87 – 94.
Dominguez-Lara, S. & Merino-Soto, C. (en prensa). Versión breve de la Escala de afrontamiento ante la ansiedad e incertidumbre preexamen (COPEAU) en universitarios peruanos. Educación Médica. doi: 10.1016/j.edumed.2017.04.01
Dominguez-Lara, S. & Merino-Soto, C. (2015). ¿Por qué es importante reportar los intervalos de confianza del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach? Revista Lationamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 13(2), 1326-1328.
Dominguez-Lara, S., Merino-Soto, C., & Navarro-Loli, J. (2016). Estimación de la Confiabilidad en Mediciones de dos ítems: el Coeficiente Angoff-Feldt. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 10(1), 34 – 40. doi: /10.19083/ridu.10.463
Dominguez-Lara, S., Merino-Soto, C., Zamudio, B., & Guevara, C. (en prensa). Big Five Inventory en universitarios peruanos: Resultados preliminares de la validación. Psykhé.
Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399 – 412. Doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046
Elosua, P., & Zumbo, B.D. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada. Psicothema, 20(4), 896-901.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Feldt, L. S. (1980). A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient is the same for two tests administered to the same sample. Psychometrika, 45, 99-105. doi: 10.1007/BF02293600
Feldt, L. S., & Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. En Linn, R. L. (Ed). En Educational Measurement (pp. 105 – 146). New York: Macmillan.
Feldt, L. S., & Charter, R. A. (2003). Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length. Psychological Methods, 8(1), 102-109. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.1.102
Feldt, L. S., Woodruff, D. J., & Salih, F. A. (1987) Statistical inference for coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11(1), 93-103. Doi: 10.1177/014662168701100107
Ferrando, P.J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33.
Fetvadjiev, V., & Van der Vijver, F.J.R. (2015). Universality of the five-factor model of personality. In J.D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol 9, p. 249 – 253). Oxford: Elsevier.
Fisher, R. (1950). Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver & Boyd.
Fleming, J., & Merino, C. (2005). Medidas de simplicidad y ajuste factorial: Un enfoque para la construcción y revisión de escalas derivadas factorialmente. Revista de Psicología, 23(2), 252-266.
Fossati, A., Borroni, S., Marchione, D., & Maffei, C. (2011). The Big Five Inventory (BFI). Reliability and Validity of its Italian Translation in Three Independent Nonclinical Samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 50-58. Doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000043
Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B.D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 17(3). Recuperado de: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=17&n=3.
Gerlitz J. Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. Dokumentation der Instrumentenentwicklung BFI-S auf Basis des SOEP-Pretests 2005. DIW Research, Notes 4.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216 – 1229. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
Goldberg, L. R., & Kilkowski, J. M. (1985). The prediction of semantic consistency in self-descriptions: Characteristics of persons and of terms that affect the consistency of responses to synonym and antonym pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 82 – 98.
Goldberg, L., Johnson, J., Eber, H., Hogan, R., Ashton, R., & Robert, C. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
Gosling, S., Rentfrow, P., & Swann, W., (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. Doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
Guido, G., Peluso, A.M., Capestro, M., & Miglietta, M. (2015). An italian version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory: An application to hedonic and utilitarian shopping values. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 135 – 140. Doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.053
Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(2), 354 – 370. Doi: 10.1037/a0030841
Hahn, E., Gottschling, J., & Spinath, F. M. (2012). Short measurements of personality–Validity and reliability of the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S). Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 355-359. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.008
Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. En R. Cudeck, S. H. C. du Toit & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Past and present. A Festschrift in honor of Karl G. Jöreskog (pp. 195–261). Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and brain sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. Doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
John, O.P., Donahue, E.M., & Kentle, R.L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. California: Institute of Personality and Social Research.
Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-35. Doi: 10.1007/BF02291575
Kim, S.Y., Kim, J.M., Yoo, J.A., Bae K.Y., Kim, S.W., Yang, S.J., Shin, I.S., & Yoon, J.S. (2010). Standardization and validation of Big Five Inventory – Korean version (BFI-K) in elders. Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 17(1), 15-25.
Lance, C., Dawson, B., Birkelbach, D., & Hoffman, B. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 435-455. Doi: 10.1177/1094428109352528
Lautenschlager, G. J., & Meade, A. W. (2008). AlphaTest: A windows program for tests of hypotheses about coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 502-503. Doi: 10.1177/0146621607312307
Levy, P. (1967). The correction for spurious correlation in the evaluation of short-form tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 84-86.
Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. Doi: 10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. (2013). FACTOR 9.2 A comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497-498. Doi: 10.1177/0146621613487794
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J.M.F. (2006). Tucker's Congruence Coefficient as a Meaningful Index of Factor Similarity. Methodology, 2, 57-64. Doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57.
Lovik, A., Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2017). Evaluation of a very short test to measure the Big Five personality factors on a Flemish sample. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 25(2), 7-17.
McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547 – 561. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Merino, C., & Grimaldo, M. (2011). Complejidad factorial y conductas moralmente controversiales. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 3(3), 38-43.
Merino-Soto, C., Navarro-Loli, J., & García, W. (2014). Revisión de la consistencia interna del Inventario de Inteligencia Emocional de Bar-On, EQ-I: YV. Revista Peruana de Psicología y Trabajo Social, 3(1),141-154.
Ortet, G., Ibáñez, M., Ruipérez, M., Villa, H., Moya, J., & Escrivá, P. (2007). Adaptación para adolescentes de la versión española del NEO PI-R. Psicothema, 19(2), 263-268.
Pejić, M., Tenjović, L., & Knežević, G. (2014). Validacija upitnika ličnosti BFI-10–kratke forme inventara velikih pet. Primenjena Psihologija, 7(1), 45-92.
Pérez, E., & Medrano, L. A. (2010). Análisis factorial exploratorio: bases conceptuales y metodológicas. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2(1), 58-66.
Petrides, K. V., Jackson, C. J., Furnham, A., & Levine, S. Z. (2003). Exploring issues of personality measurement and structure throughthe development of a short form of the Eysenck personality profiler. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 271–280. Doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8103_10
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. Doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Ponterotto, J.G., & Charter R.A. (2009). Statistical extensions of Ponterotto and Ruckdeschel´s (2007) reliability matriz for estimating the adecuacy of internal consistency coefficients. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108, 878 – 886. Doi: 10.2466/PMS.108.3.878-886
Putnam, S. P., & Rothbart, M. K. (2006). Development of short and very short forms of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 102-112. Doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_09
Rammstedt, B. (2007): The 10-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10): Norm values and inves¬tigation of socio-demographic effects based on a German population representative sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 193-201. Doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.193
Rammstedt, B., & John, O.P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203 – 212. Doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
Rammstedt, B., Kemper, C. J., Klein, M. C., Beierlein, C., & Kovaleva, A. (2013). Eine kurze skala zur messung der fünf dimensionen der persönlichkeit. Methoden, Daten, Analysen, 7(2), 233-249.
Reyes, E., Álvarez, C., Peredo, A., Miranda, A., & Rebolledo, I. (2014). Psychometric properties of the big five inventory in a Mexican sample. Salud Mental, 37, 491 – 497.
Rodriguez, M., & Ruiz, M. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: Incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica, 29, 205-227.
Romano, J. L., Kromrey, J. D., & Hibbard, S. T. (2010). A Monte Carlo study of eight confidence interval methods for coefficient alpha. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 376-393. Doi: 10.1177/0013164409355690
Romano, J. L., Kromrey, J. D., Owens, C. M., & Scott, H. M. (2011). Confidence interval methods for coefficient alpha on the basis of discrete, ordinal response items: Which one, if any, is the best? The Journal of Experimental Education 79(4), 382-403. Doi: 10.1080/00220973.2010.510859
Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg´s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506-516. Doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 173-212. Doi: 10.1177/0022022106297299
Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated with faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271-295. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1910.tb00206.x
Tataryn, D., Wood, J., & Gorsuch, R. (1999). Setting the value of k in promax: A Monte Carlo study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 384-391. Doi: 10.1177/00131649921969938
Ten Berge, J. (1986). Some relationships between descriptive comparisons of components from different studies. Mutivariate Behavioral Research, 21(1), 29-40. Doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2101_2
Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. Personnel Research Section Report, 984. Washington, D. C.: Department of the Army.
Ubbiali, A., Chiorri, C., Hampton, P., & Donati, D. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Italian adaptation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 266, 37–46.
Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Kijima, N., Yoshimura, K., ... & Livesley, W. J. (2006). Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90(6), 987-999. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.987
Worrell, F. C., & Cross,William E.,,Jr. (2004). The reliability and validity of big five inventory scores with African American college students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 32(1), 18 – 32. Doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1912.2004.tb00358.x
Publicado
2018-06-28
Cómo citar
Dominguez-Lara, S., & Merino-Soto, C. (2018, junio 28). Dos versiones breves del Big Five Inventory en universitarios peruanos: BFI-15p y BFI-10p. LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana De Psicología, 24(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2018.v24n1.06
Sección
Artículos Originales Breves.
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Derechos de autor: En caso de que el manuscrito sea aprobado para su publicación, los autores conservarán los derechos de autoría y cederán a la revista los derechos de publicación, edición, reproducción, distribución, exhibición y comunicación a nivel nacional e internacional en las diferentes bases de datos, repositorios y portales.
Política de autoarchivo: El autor puede compartir, difundir y divulgar sus investigaciones publicadas por los medios de comunicación (e.g., redes sociales académicas, repositorios y portales) disponibles en la web. Durante el proceso de revisión editorial, la revista entregará al autor las versiones previas (post-print), las cuales NO deben ser divulgadas por ningún medio de difusión y son solo de uso personal con fines de aprobación final. Liberabit enviará al autor la versión final del artículo (published version) en formato PDF y HTML para ser compartida, difundida y divulgada por los medios de comunicación disponibles en la web. Después de la publicación de los artículos, los autores pueden realizar acuerdos independientes o adicionales para la difusión no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en la revista (por ejemplo, publicación en libros o repositorios institucionales), siempre que se indique con la referencia respectiva que el trabajo ha sido publicado por primera vez en esta revista.
