Estructura latente del KIDDO-KINDL en una muestra peruana
Resumen
El presente estudio evaluó las propiedades psicométricas del instrumento KIDDO-KINDL (Ravens-Sieberer y Bullinger, 1998), que cuantifica la calidad de vida relacionada a la salud en niños y adolescentes. En una muestra de 377 alumnos del primer al quinto grado de secundaria, el análisis factorial confirmatorio demostró que la estructura interna original de seis factores no es satisfactoria para representar los constructos cuantificados debido a que presenta inestabilidad dimensional a nivel de los ítems en los factores Familia, Emocional, Amigos y Escuela. Al aplicar el análisis factorial exploratorio se encontró una estructura de cuatro factores. Esta solución factorial obtuvo mejores indicadores de consistencia interna (valores entre 0.59 y 0.81) en comparación con la estructura original (valores entre 0.24 y 0.80), y cargas factoriales más elevadas. Se discuten los posibles cambios en la interpretación de KIDDO-KINDL.
Descargas
Citas
Abidi, H. (2007). RV coefficient and congruence coefficient. En N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics (pp. 849-853). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7.a ed.). Nueva Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Badia, X., Benavides, A., & Rajmil, L. (2001). Instrumentos de evaluación de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en niños y adolescentes con asma. Anales Españoles en Pediatría, 54(3), 213-221.
Banco Mundial (2016). Edad de ingreso a la escuela secundaria (años). Recuperado de http://datos.bancomundial.org/
Barret, P. (2005). Orthosim: Computer program [software]. Recuperado de www.pbarrett.net/orthosim/orthosim.html
Cattell, R. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245-276.
Charter, R. (1996). Revisiting the standard errors of measurement, estimate, and prediction and their application to test scores. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82(3), 1139-1144.
Charter, R. (2003a). A breakdown of reliability coefficients by test type and reliability method, and clinical implications of low reliability. The Journal of General Psychology, 130(3), 290-304.
Charter, R. (2003b). Study samples are too small to produce sufficiently precise reliability coefficients. The Journal of General Psychology, 130(2), 117-129.
Charter, R. & Feldt, L. (2001). Meaning of reliability in terms of correct and incorrect clinical decisions: The art of decision making is still alive. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23(4), 530-537.
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and estandardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997-1003.
Costa, P. & McCrae, R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
Cronbach, L., Schönemann, P., & McKie, D. (1965). Alpha coefficients for stratified-parallel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25(2), 291-312.
Eiser, C. & Morse, R. (2001a). The measurement of quality of life in children: Past and future perspectives. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 22(4), 248-256.
Eiser, C. & Morse, R. (2001b). A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 84(3), 205–211.
Enzmann, D. (1997). RanEigen: A program for determine the parallel analysis criterion for the number of principal components. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(3), 232.
Eser, E., Yüksel, H., Baydur, H., Erhart, M., Saatli, G., CengizÖzyurt, B. … Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2008). The psychometric properties of the New Turkish Generic Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children (Kid-KINDL). Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 19(4), 409-417.
Fabrigar, L., Wegener, D., MacCallum, R., & Strahan, E. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299.
Feldt, L. S. (1969). A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach’s alpha or Kuder-Richardson coefficient twenty is the same for two tests. Psychometrika, 34(3), 363-373.
García, E., González, M., Saíz, P., & Bobes, J. (1998, noviembre). The Spanish version of the AUQUEI questionnaire (child pictured self-report). Conferencia presentada en 5th Annual Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Research, Maryland, EE. UU.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2.a ed.). Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.>
Guadarrama, R., Hernández, J., Veytia, M., Márquez, O., & Carrillo, S. (2015). Confiabilidad y estructura factorial de Kiddo-Kindl, una herramienta de medición para la calidad de vida de los adolescentes mexicanos. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 20(2), 1-10.
Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19(2), 149-161.
Hays, R. & Hayashi, T. (1990). Beyond internal consistency reliability: Rationale and user’s guide for Multitrait Analysis Program on the microcomputer. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 22(2), 167-175.
Hays, R. & Wang, E. (1992, abril). Multitrait Scaling Program: MULTI. Documento presentado en SAS Users Group International Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Hayton, J., Allen, D., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191-205.
Helseth S. & Lund, T. (2005). Assessing health-related quality of life in adolescents: Some psychometric properties of the first Norwegian version of KINDL. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19(2), 102-109.
Horn, J. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
Hunsley, J. & Marsh, E. J. (2008). Developing criteria for evidence-based assessment: An introduction to assessment that work. En J. Hunsley & E. J. Mash (Eds.) A guide to assessments that work (pp. 3-14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Inocencio, J. de, García-Consuegra, J., Merino, R., Calvo, I., García, J. J., & Ruperto, N. (2001). The European Spanish version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ).Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 19(S23), S141-S145.
Kaiser, H. (1960). The application of electronic computer to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
Kenny, D. & McCoach, D. (2003). Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(3), 333-351. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1
Lee, P., Chang, L., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2008). Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwanese version of the Kiddo-KINDL Generic Children’s Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument. Quality of Life Research, 17(4), 603-611.
Linn, R. (1968). A Monte Carlo approach to the number of factors problem. Psychometrika, 33(1), 37-71.
Liu, Y. & Zumbo, B. (2007). The impact of outliers on Cronbach’s coefficient alpha estimate of reliability: Visual analogue scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 620-634.
Liu, Y., Wu, A., & Zumbo, B. (2010). The impact of outliers on Cronbach’s coefficient alpha estimate of reliability: Ordinal/ rating scale item responses. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(1), 5-21.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Mutidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320-341. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
Martín, A. (2005). Compendio de atención primaria (2.a ed.). Barcelona: Elsevier.
McCrae, R. & Costa, P. (1989). Rotation to maximize the construct validity of factors in the NEO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(1), 107-124. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2401_7
McCrae, R., Zonderman, A., Costa, P., Bond, M., & Paunonen, S. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 552-566.
Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5-8.
Moreno-Jiménez, B. & Kern, E. (2005). Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud infantil y el trasplante de órganos: Una revisión de literatura. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 14, 46-52.
Murohashi, H. & Furusho, J. (2011). Item analysis of the Japanese version of the Generic Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for children and adolescent: Kid-KINDLR and Kiddo-KINDL-R. Proceedings, 13(1), 45-53.
Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I. (1995). Teoría psicométrica (3.a ed.). México D. F: McGraw-Hill.
Patrick, D. & Bergner, M. (1990). Measurement of Health Status in the 1990s. Annual Review of Public Health, 11, 165-183.
Quiñonez, F., Ordóñez, F., & Salas, I. (2012). La calidad de vida de los adolescentes en municipios marginados: El caso de Huejuquilla el Alto, Jalisco. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Itzacala, 15(3), 929-948.
Rajmil, L., Estrada, M., Herdman, M., Serra-Sutton, V., & Alonso, J. (2001). Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS): Revisión de la bibliografía y de los instrumentos adaptados en España. Gaceta Sanitaria, 15(4), 34-43.
Rajmil, L., Serra-Sutton, V., Alonso, J., Starfield, B., Riley, A., & Vazquez, J. (2003). The Spanish version of the Child Health and Illness Profile-Adolescent Edition (CHIP-AE). Quality of Life Research, 12(3), 303-313.
Rajmil, L., Serra-Sutton V., Fernandez-Lopez J., Berra S., Aymerich M., Cieza A. … Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2004). Versión española del cuestionario alemán de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en población infantil y de adolescentes: El Kindl. Anales de Pediatría, 60(6), 514-521.
Ravens-Sieberer, U. & Bullinger, M. (1998). Assessing healthrelated quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: First psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7(5), 399-407.
Ravens-Sieberer, U. & Bullinger, M. (2000). KINDL: Questionnaire for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life children and Adolescent (revised version). Recuperado de http://www.kindl.org/english/manual/
Ruperto, N., Ravelli, A., Pistorio, A., Malattia, C., Cavuto, S., Gado-West, L., ... Martini, A. (2001). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) in 32 countries. Review of the general methodology. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 19(S23), S1-S9.
Serra-Sutton, V., Ferrer, M., Rajmil, L., Tebe, C., Simeoni, M., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2009). Population norms and cutoff-points for suboptimal health related quality of life in two generic measures for adolescents: The Spanish VSP-A and KINDL-R. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 21, 7-35.
Serra-Sutton, V., Herdman, M., Rajmil, L., Santed, R., Ferrer, M., Simeoni, M. C., & Auquier P. (2002). Adaptación española del cuestionario Vecu et SantePercue de l’Adolescent (VSPA): Una medida genérica de calidad de vida para adolescentes. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 76(6), 701-712.
Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107-120.
Silverstein, A. (1987). Note on the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors or principal components. Psychological Reports, 61(2), 351-354.
Solans, M., Pane, S., Estrada, M. D., Serra-Sutton, V., Berra, S., Herdman, M. … Rajmil, L. (2008). Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: A systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments. Value in Health, 11(4), 742-764.
Stevanovic, D. (2009). Serbian KINDL questionnaire for quality of life assessments in healthy children and adolescents: reproducibility and construct validity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 79. Recuperado de http://www.hqlo.com/ content/7/1/79
Stevanovic, D., Lakic, A., & Vilotic, J. (2009). The psychometric study of the Serbian KINDL questionnaire for health-related quality of life assessment in children and adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 23(2), 361-368.
Tataryn, D., Wood, J., & Gorsuch, R. (1999). Setting the value of k in promax: A Monte Carlo study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(3), 384-391.
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., Boer, M. R. de, van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J. … Vet, H. C. de. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34-42.
Texeira, I., Novais, I., Pinto, R., & Cheik, N. (2012). Adaptação cultural e validação do Questionário KINDL no Brasil para adolescentes entre 12 e 16 anos. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 15(4), 845-857.
Urzúa, A. & Mercado, G. (2008). La evaluación de la calidad de vida de los adolescentes a través del Kiddo-Kindl. Terapia Psicológica, 26(1), 133-141.
Velicer, W. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41(3), 321-327.
Velicer, W., Eaton, C., & Fava, J. (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. En R. D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 41-71). Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic.
Wee, H., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., & Li, S.C. (2007). Factor structure of the Singapore English version of the KINDL Children Quality of Life Questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(4), 1-8.
WHOQOL GROUP. (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of life assessment (WHOQOL). Position Paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403-1409.
Wilcox, R. (1992). Robust generalizations of classical test reliability and Cronbach’s alpha. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45(2), 239-254.
Yamaguchi, N., Poudel, K. C., Poudel-Tandukar, K., Shakya, D., Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Jimba, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of a Nepalese version of the Kiddo KINDL in adolescents. Biosci Trends, 4(4), 178-185.
Zimmerman, D., Zumbo, B., & Lalonde, C. (1993).Coefficient alpha as an estimate of test reliability under violation of two assumptions. Education and Psychological Measurement, 53, 33-49.
Zoski, K. & Jurs, S. (1996). An objective counterpart to the visual scree test for factor analysis: The standard error scree. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(3), 443-451.
Zwick, W. & Velicer, W. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 432-442.
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Derechos de autor: En caso de que el manuscrito sea aprobado para su publicación, los autores conservarán los derechos de autoría y cederán a la revista los derechos de publicación, edición, reproducción, distribución, exhibición y comunicación a nivel nacional e internacional en las diferentes bases de datos, repositorios y portales.
Política de autoarchivo: El autor puede compartir, difundir y divulgar sus investigaciones publicadas por los medios de comunicación (e.g., redes sociales académicas, repositorios y portales) disponibles en la web. Durante el proceso de revisión editorial, la revista entregará al autor las versiones previas (post-print), las cuales NO deben ser divulgadas por ningún medio de difusión y son solo de uso personal con fines de aprobación final. Liberabit enviará al autor la versión final del artículo (published version) en formato PDF y HTML para ser compartida, difundida y divulgada por los medios de comunicación disponibles en la web. Después de la publicación de los artículos, los autores pueden realizar acuerdos independientes o adicionales para la difusión no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en la revista (por ejemplo, publicación en libros o repositorios institucionales), siempre que se indique con la referencia respectiva que el trabajo ha sido publicado por primera vez en esta revista.