Precisión y aspectos prosódicos en la lectura en voz alta en adolescentes

  • Julieta Carolina Fumagalli Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y tecnológicas (CONICET), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Instituto de Lingüística http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-5777
  • Juan Pablo Barreyro Centro Interdisciplinario en Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental (CIIPME); Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1606-1049
  • Florencia Fant Instituto de Lingüística, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aries http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4680-2521
  • Virginia Irene Jaichenco Instituto de Lingüística, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires; Instituto de Educación, Universidad Nacional de Hurlingham, Argentina http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-5001
Palabras clave: fluidez lectora, lectura en voz alta, precisión, prosodia, adolescente

Resumen

Antecedentes: la fluidez lectora se define como una lectura rápida, sin errores y con la entonación adecuada, lo que se refleja en la comprensión lectora. La fluidez debería estar consolidada en el nivel secundario. Objetivo: presentar los resultados obtenidos al aplicar una escala subjetiva de fluidez diseñada ad hoc que contempla medidas de precisión y expresividad lectora. Método: una muestra de 39 estudiantes de 1.er año de nivel secundario respondió una tarea de lectura en voz alta y comprensión de dos textos expositivos (1 y 2), uno con puntuación (condición A) y otro sin puntuación (condición B) que fueron administrados de modo contrabalanceado. Resultados: se comparó el rendimiento en fluidez según la condición de presentación de los textos (A y B), se realizó un análisis percentilar y nueve análisis de varianza mixto, considerando como variable independiente intersujeto la condición de fluidez (fluido vs. no fluido), como variable independiente intrasujeto la condición de puntuación del texto (sin vs. con puntuación) y como variables dependientes las medidas contempladas en la escala. Conclusiones: los resultados permiten diferenciar entre estudiantes fluidos y no fluidos e indican que estos grupos se diferencian en relación con los aspectos prosódicos o expresivos al leer.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Almeida, S. A., & Fonseca, A. A. (2018). A relação entre os sinais de pontuação e o processamento de leitura de alunos concluintes do Ensino Médio. Signo, 43(77), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v43i77.11534

Álvarez-Cañizo, M., Martínez-García, C., Cuetos, F., & Suárez-Coalla, P. (2020). Development of reading prosody in school-age Spanish children: a longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Reading. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12286

Amiama-Espaillat, C., & Mayor-Ruiz, C. (2018). Explorando la relación entre fluidez lectora y competencia lectora en Educación Secundaria. Ocnos. Revista De Estudios Sobre Lectura, 17(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2018.17.1.1278

Aprender 2016. (2017). Aprender. Secretaría de Evaluación Educativa, Ministerio de Educación y Deportes. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Educación y Deportes.

Aprender 2017. (2018). Aprender 2017 Informe de resultados Primaria. Secretaría de Evaluación Educativa, Ministerio de Educación y Deportes. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Educación y Deportes.

Aprender 2018. (2019). Aprender 2018 Informe nacional de resultados 6to grado año Nivel Primario. Secretaría de Evaluación Educativa. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura, Ciencia y Tecnología. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Educación y Deportes.

Aprender 2019. (2020) Evaluación de la educación secundaria en Argentina 2019 / 1a ed. - Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Educación de la Nación.

Aprender 2021. (2022) Educación Primaria: informe nacional de resultados: análisis sobre los logros de aprendizaje y sus condiciones. - 2a ed - Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires : Ministerio de Educación de la Nación.

Arancibia Gutiérrez, B., León, H., Castro Yáñez, G. G., Bizama Muñoz, M., & Sáez Carrillo, K. (2022). Comprensión de lectura, reconocimiento de palabras y fluidez lectora en escolares de sexto año básico. Onomázein, (55), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.55.05

Arancibia, B., Leiva, F. (2022). Fluidez lectora, reconocimiento de palabras y velocidad lectora en escolares de 3º y 4º año de enseñanza básica. Revista Literatura y Lingüística, 46, 367-388. https://doi.org/10.29344/0717621X.46.2673

Arcand, M.-S., Dion, E., Lemire-Théberge, L., Guay, M.-H., Barrette, A., Gagnon, V., Caron, P.-O., & Fuchs, D. (2014). Segmenting texts into meaningful word groups: Beginning readers’ prosody and comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(3), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.864658

Baron, N. S. (2001). Commas and canaries: The role of punctuation in speech and writing. Language Sciences, 23(1), 15-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00027-9

Benjamin, R. G., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Groff, C., Kuhn, M. R., & Steiner, L. (2013). A spectrographically grounded scale for evaluating reading expressiveness. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.43

Bizama, M.; Silva, D. & Rodríguez, C. (2019). Inteligencia fluida, memoria de trabajo, fluidez lectora y comprensión de lectura en escolares chilenos. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology. https://doi.org/17. 10.25115/ejrep.v17i48.2251.

Bolaños, D., Cole, R. A., Ward, W. H., Tindal, G. A., Hasbrouck, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2013). Human and automated assessment of oral reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1142–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031479

Breen, M. (2014). Empirical investigations of the role of implicit prosody in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(2), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12061

Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104047

Clemens, N. H., Hsiao, Y.-Y., Lee, K., Martinez-Lincoln, A., Moore, C., Toste, J., & Simmons, L. (2020). The Differential Importance of Component Skills on Reading Comprehension Test Performance Among Struggling Adolescent Readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 002221942093213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420932139

Cuadro, A., Mailhos, A., Estevan, I., & Martínez-Sánchez, F. (2021). Competencia Lectora, Fluidez y Ritmo. Psicothema, 33 (Número 2), 222–227. Recuperado a partir de https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/17090

Cuetos, F.; Arribas, D. y Ramos, JL. (2016): PROLEC-SE-R. Batería de Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores en Secundaria y Bachillerato. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

Denton C. A. (2012). Response to intervention for reading difficulties in the primary grades: some answers and lingering questions. Journal of learning disabilities, 45(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412442155

Denton, C.; Barth, A.; Fletcher, J.; Wexler, J.; Vaughn, S.; Cirino, P.; Romain, M. & Francis, D. (2011). The Relations Among Oral and Silent Reading Fluency and Comprehension in Middle School: Implications for Identification and Instruction of Students With Reading Difficulties. Scientific studies of reading: the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. 15. 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623546.

Denton, C. A., Hall, C., Cho, E., Cannon, G., Scammacca, N., & Wanzek, J. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of foundational skills and multicomponent reading interventions on reading comprehension for primary-grade students. Learning and individual differences, 93, 102062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102062

Dowd, A. J., & Bartlett, L. (2019). The need for speed: Interrogating the dominance of oral reading fluency in international reading efforts. Comparative Education Review, 63(2), 189-212.

Eason, S. H., Sabatini, J., Goldberg, L., Bruce, K., & Cutting, L. E. (2013). Examining the relationship between word reading efficiency and oral reading rate in predicting comprehension among different types of readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(3), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.652722

Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of Sight Word Reading: Phases and Findings. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch8

Elosúa, M. R., García-Madruga, J. A., Vila, J. O., Gómez-Veiga, I., & Gil, L. (2013). Improving reading comprehension: From metacognitive intervention on strategies to the intervention on working memory executive processes. Universitas Psychologica, 12(5). doi:10.11144/javeriana.upsy12-5.ircm

Ferguson, M. (2020). Washington View: What the NAEP reveals. Phi Delta Kappan, 101(5), 62–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720903832

Fodor, J.D. (2002). Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading. In M. Hirotani, (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 32. Amherst: GLSA Publications.

Fodor, J. D. (1998). Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(2), 285–319. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023258301588

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Competence: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0503_3

Fumagalli, J., Sánchez, M., Barreyro, J., Jacubovich, S., & Jaichenco, V. (2018) Evaluación de la fluidez lectora en niños con dislexia. Revista Argentina de Neuropsicología, 34, 12-30.

Fumagalli, J., Barreyro, J., & Jaichenco, V. (2020). SUBJETIVAS Y OBJETIVAS Reading fluency assessment : Objective and subjective measures. 14(1426), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.7714/CNPS/14.1.209

Fumagalli, J., Ferroni, M., & Jaichenco, V. I. (2022). Evaluación de la lectura: una escala de fluidez basada en textos. Revista Iberoamericana de psicología, 15(3), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15302

Godde, E., Bosse, M.-L., & Bailly, G. (2019). A review of reading prosody acquisition and development. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09968-1

Godde, E., Bailly, G., & Bosse, M.-L. (2021). Pausing and breathing while reading aloud: Development from 2nd to 7th grade in french speaking children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10168-z

Gómez Zapata, Esther, Defior, Sylvia, & Serrano, Francisca. (2011). Mejorar la fluidez lectora en dislexia: diseño de un programa de intervención en español. Escritos de Psicología (Internet), 4(2), 65-73. Recuperado en 30 de junio de 2023, de http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1989-38092011000200008&lng=es&tlng=es.

González-Trujillo, M. C., Calet, N., Defior, S., & Gutiérrez-Palma, N. (2014). Escala de fluidez lectora en español: midiendo los componentes de la fluidez. Estudios de Psicologia, 35(1), 104–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2014.893651

Groen, M. A., Veenendaal, N. J., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). The role of prosody in reading comprehension: evidence from poor comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12133

Heggie, L., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2018). Prosodic awareness and punctuation ability in adult readers. Reading Psychology, 39(2), 188–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1413021

Hernandez Sampieri, R., Fernandez Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2008). Metodología de la investigación (4 ed.). México, DF: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading Fluency Assessment and Instruction: What, Why, and How? The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702–714. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.58.8.1

Hudson, R. F., Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B., & Torgesen, J. K. (2008). The Complex Nature of Reading Fluency: A Multidimensional View. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(1), 4–32. https://doi.org /10.1080/10573560802491208

Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.719

Kanniainen, L., Kiili, C., Tolvanen, A., Aro, M., & Leppänen, P. H. T. (2019). Literacy skills and online research and comprehension: struggling readers face difficulties online. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org /10.1007/s11145-019-09944-9

Kentner, G. (2012). Linguistic rhythm guides parsing decisions in written sentence comprehension. Cognition, 123(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.012

Klingner, J. K., Morrison, A., & Eppolito, A. (2011). Metacognition to improve reading comprehension. In R. E. O’Connor & P. Vadasy (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 220-253). New York: Guilfor.

Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., & Levy, B. A., & Rasinski, T. V. (Eds.). (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2

Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of Word Reading Fluency and Spelling in a Consistent Orthography: An 8-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 150–161. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.150

Lesaux, N. K., & Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Exploring Sources of Reading Comprehension Difficulties Among Language Minority Learners and Their Classmates in Early Adolescence. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 596–632. https://doi. org/10.3102/0002831209355469

Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.839

Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Reading Prosody as a Dimension of Oral Reading Fluency in Early Elementary School Children. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.43.4.2

Morris, D.; Pennell, A.; Perney, J. & Trathen, W. (2018). Using Subjective and Objective Measures to Predict Reading Fluency at the End of First Grade. Reading Psychology. 39. https://doi. org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1418466.

Muñoz, M. B., Silva, D. S., & Rodríguez, C. R. (2019). Inteligencia fluida, memoria de trabajo, fluidez lectora y comprensión de lectura en escolares chilenos. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 17(48). https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v17i48.2251

National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). 2019 NAEP mathematics and reading assessments: Highlighted results at grades 4 and 8 for the nation, states, and districts. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Dept. of Education.

National Reading Panel (U.S.) & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Nomvete, P., & Easterbrooks, S. R. (2020). Phrase-reading mediates between words and syntax in struggling adolescent readers. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 41(3), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740119825616

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results. What Students Know and Can Do. Volume 1. Paris, FR: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5F07C754-EN

Oslund, E. L., Clemens, N. H., Simmons, D. C., & Simmons, L. E. (2017). The direct and indirect effects of word reading and vocabulary on adolescents’ reading comprehension: Comparing struggling and adequate comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 355–379. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11145-017-9788-3

Pikulski, John J., and David J. Chard. “Fluency: Bridge between Decoding and Reading Comprehension.” The Reading Teacher, vol. 58, no. 6, 2005, pp. 510–19. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20205516. Accessed 3 July 2023.

Pratt, E. (2018). Prosody in sentence processing. In E. M. Fernández & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 365–391). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829516.ch16

Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing Reading Fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning (PREL), 28. www.prel.org/programs/rel/rel.asp.%0Ahttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED483166

Rasinski, T. (2010). The fluent reader. New York: Scholastic

Rasinski, T., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? more than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070802468715

Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E. J., Potter, M. C., & Treiman, R. (2016). So Much to Read, So Little Time: How Do We Read, and Can Speed Reading Help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615623267

Recio-Pineda, S. R. (2019). Velocidad de lectura, prosodia, y resultados de comprensión. Revista Horizontes De Linguistica Aplicada, 18(2), 115-137.

Rupley, W. H., Nichols, W. D., Rasinski, T. V., & Paige, D. (2020). Fluency: Deep Roots in Reading Instruction. Education Sciences, 10(6), 155. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060155

Sait Akbaşlı, A., Mehmet Şahin, A., & Zeliha Yaykiran, S. (2016). The Effect of Reading Comprehension on the Performance in Science and Mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16), 108–121. Retrieved from www.iiste.org

Sautú, R. (1991). Teoría y medición del estatus ocupacional: escalas ocupacionales objetivas y de prestigio. Buenos Aires, AR: Universidad de Buenos Aires.

Schleicher, A. (2018). PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations. Paris, FR: OECD Publishing.

Scholes, R. J., & Willis, B. J. (1990). Prosodic and syntactic functions of punctuation: A contribution to the study of orality and literacy. Interchange, 21(3), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01809416

Schreiber, P. A. (1980). On the Acquisition of Reading Fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12(3), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968009547369

Schreiber, P. A. (1991). Understanding prosody’s role in reading acquisition. Theory Into Practice, 30(3), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543496

Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a Fluent Reader: Reading Skill and Prosodic Features in the Oral Reading of Young Readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119

Silva-Maceda, Gabriela, & Romero-Contreras, Silvia. (2017). Leer rápido no siempre es igual a comprender: Examinando la relación entre velocidad y comprensión. Revista Costarricense de Psicología, 36(2), 123-144. https://dx.doi.org/10.22544/rcps.v36i02.03

Silverman, R. D., Speece, D. L., Harring, J. R., & Ritchey, K. D. (2013). Fluency has a role in the simple view of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(2), 108–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.618153

Steinhauer, K. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation. Brain and Language, 86(1), 142–164. doi:10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00542-4

Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010443001646

Torgesen, J. K., & Hudson, R. F. (2006). Reading Fluency: Critical Issues for Struggling Readers. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 130–158). International Reading Association.

Trapman, M., van Gelderen, A., van Schooten, E., & Hulstijn, J. (2017). Reading comprehension level and development in native and language minority adolescent low achievers: Roles of linguistic and metacognitive knowledge and fluency. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 33(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1183541

Valencia, S. W., Smith, A. T., Reece, A. M., Li, M., Wixson, K. K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(3), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.3.1
Veenendaal, N. J., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). The role of speech prosody and text reading prosody in children’s reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12036

Veenendaal, N. J., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Bidirectional Relations Between Text Reading Prosody and Reading Comprehension in the Upper Primary School Grades: A Longitudinal Perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1128939

Zimmerman, B. S., Rasinski, T. V., Was, C. A., Rawson, K. A., Dunlosky, J., Kruse, S. D., & Nikbakht, E. (2019). Enhancing Outcomes for Struggling Readers: Empirical Analysis of The Fluency Development Lesson. Reading Psychology, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2018.1555365
Publicado
2023-11-24
Sección
Artículos de investigación